CR 155 of 722
Billy:
I know. You have a tremendous amount to do in this regard. But can we now talk about something else? Semjase once told me that I may not take a photo of her because she moves every now and then on the Earth among the human beings and may not be recognized. But that can’t be the whole reason because this explanation seems somewhat flimsy to me.
Quetzal:
121. To explain something incompletely to you is almost impossible:
122. Yes, there is another reason, and it is based on the fact that a lot of damage and harm can be caused by photos if human beings with evil thoughts concentrate negatively upon others and upon photographically depicted human beings.
123. Negatively oriented Earth human beings could affect us so heavily and viciously and inflict a lot of harm and evil upon us if they could steal photographic images of us.
124. This is the second and most important reason why we may not let ourselves be photographically depicted.
125. With Asket and Nera, we could allow it only because both of them live in the DAL Universe and cannot be affected from the Earth in their lives in the aforementioned way because no forces of any kind can penetrate through the barriers of the Universe.
126. Graphical representations, however, are harmless.
Beam of Light 
Pingback: Warning Part 3- this is what UFO new age Bullshit looks like-Terran Cognito 10-20-19… “Confirmation of two Galactics in images” — Kauilapele’s Blog | Cosmic Love
very convenient 😂 fraud. This dude even dared to claim sitchin’s work is totally false and anunnaki never existed, FALSE. If it was just fantasy, how come the same gods appear in different unrelated civilizations at the same time? Sumer and Indus Valley had basically the same pantheon with different names. Very similar stories too, like Noah’s ark and the great flood. Inanna is Durga, both represented riding a lion, both having similar position and attire and functions, both with the star. Anu Enlil Enki is literally Brahma Shiva and Vishnu. Same exact qualities. They all had the same dreams and visions? The only one having visions is this self proclaimed prophet. FLOP
LikeLike
1. Actually it is Quetzal the ET who says the following, “112. However, that which emerges from old texts regarding the Annunaki and the planet Niburu is based on mythological facts as well as beliefs, misguidance and erroneous assumptions.
113. The Annunaki beings were a pure imagination of the Earth humans, who, full of fantasy and according to their beliefs, fabricated the “Annunaki people from the planet Niburu”, as the giant shape in the sky appeared, which truly did not deal with an actual planet, rather it concerned an uncommonly big comet, which actually does have an orbital period around the solar system of around 3,600 years.”
114. That therefore only entered as myth into the imagination of the ancient Earth humans. Indeed, it truly never existed, because the comet is not in a position to bear human life.”
…Since Sitchin did not have a PERFECT understanding of the ancient language, he made mistakes in translating. It’s not TOTALLY false. It is only PARTIALLY false. You need to understand that distinction. I want to point out that the Sumerians were distant descendants of human extraterrestrials from Sirius. I am not saying that the Sumerians did not have contacts or connections with extraterrestrials. I am saying that if you would just swap the word Annunaki to Sirians, then you would be on track with the version of Billy and the Plejaren. The full story of those emigrants can be found here: https://billymeier.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/we-came-from-the-stars-and-then-from-mars-21-0.pdf
2. Noah https://billymeier.wordpress.com/2014/07/05/noahs-ark-inspired-by-yup-an-extraterrestrial/
3. speaking of prophets, https://theyflyblog.com/2024/03/dune-2-movie-mirrors-meier-the-mahdi/
4. Thank you for commenting. Obviously you are very advanced in your search for the truth, and I commend you for sharing your views with me.
LikeLike